Pengaruh Kompensasi Langsung Dan Tidak Langsung Terhadap Kinerja Aparatur

The Effect Of Direct And Indirect Compensation On Apparatus Performance

https://doi.org/10.56072/jip.v11i2.830

Authors

  • Andrie Firmansyah Program Studi Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tompotika Luwuk
  • Melda Gienardy Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Tompotika Luwuk
  • Julio Perdana Binalu Program Studi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Tompotika Luwuk
  • Aprilia Satolom Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Tompotika Luwuk

Keywords:

Direct compensation, Indirect compensation, Performance

Abstract

The type of research used in this research is qualitative research which is quantitative so it uses a Likert scale. Data collection techniques used questionnaires, interviews and literature studies. The sample used was 18 respondents. The analytical tools used are multiple linear regression, correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination, t test and F test. The results of data processing show the form of a multiple linear regression equation Y = 9.766+ 0.435X1+0.699X2+e. The correlation coefficient has a value of 0.814, which shows that the relationship between compensation variables (X1,X2) has a very strong relationship to the performance variable (Y), namely 81.4%. The coefficient of determination of 0.6629 (66.29%) shows that the contribution of the independent variable compensation (X) to the dependent variable performance (Y), the remaining 0.3171 or 31.71% is influenced by other factors not examined in the research This. The results of the t test data analysis showed that the calculated t value for direct compensation was 3.664 with a t table value of 2.131 (t calculated > t table), while the t calculated value for indirect compensation was 1.670 with a t table value of 2.131 (t calculated < t table). Simultaneous F test results obtained an F value of 14,752 and sig 0.00. The results of this research show that each direct and indirect compensation has a significant influence together on the performance of the Nanga-Nangaon village apparatus, Bunta sub-district.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto. (2002). Prosedur suatu penelitian: pendekatan praktek (Revisi kel). Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Indrastuti, S. (2020). Manajemen sumberdaya manusia stratejik. UR Press.

Kadarisman, M. (2012). Pengertian dan filosofi manajemen kompensasi. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 1–53.

Mulyadi. (2015). MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA (MSDM) (1st ed.). In Media.

Nawawi, H. (2001). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Primayana, K. H. (2015). Manajemen sumber daya manusia dalam peningkatan mutu pendidikan di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 1(02), 7–15.

Reksoatmodjo, T. . (2007). Statistika untuk Psikologi dan pendidikan.

Rumere, L. O., Pio, R. J., & Tampi, J. R. E. (2016). Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero), Tbk. Kantor Cabang Manado. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 4(1).

Sutrisno, E. (2009). Manajemen sumber daya. Jakarta: Prenamedia.

Tulenan, S. A. S. (2015). (2015). Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Pada PT. Food Station Tjipinang Jaya Oleh. 1–14.

Downloads

Published

12-09-2023

How to Cite

Firmansyah, A., Gienardy, M., Binalu, J. P., & Satolom, A. (2023). Pengaruh Kompensasi Langsung Dan Tidak Langsung Terhadap Kinerja Aparatur : The Effect Of Direct And Indirect Compensation On Apparatus Performance . Jurnal Ilmiah Produktif, 11(2), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.56072/jip.v11i2.830

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.